Honestly, I think the charter should take up no more than one or two pages (8.5 X 11).
And the font size would be?
Also, maybe we can get closer to fitting the charter to the posters rather than the other way around (this is a pipe dream, I know).
See, THIS is the type of stuff I don't understand. Charter v1.0 was created mainly, in my impression, to make sure EVERYONE had a chance for equal input. After our collective TORC experience, having a "voice" come down from on high was to be avoided; democracy was the goal. How was that "not fitting the posters"?
I realize that this question might be seen as inflammatory. Please trust me that I do not mean it to be. I'm just truly confuzzled on this point, and so many of you are so clear on it. PM me, maybe?
Maybe bullet-pointed..
OOOooo. Bullet points give me goose bumps.
I wasn't doing this committee as an affront to those who came before me,
You know what, TED? That NEVER occurred to me. Even the constitution of the United States got amended. Improvements are almost always possible, in any system.
time to flex our editing muscles
OOO
OOOOooooo. Editing muscles give me goosebumps, too.
Also, I wanted to get rid of useless pieces that either serve no purpose or don't work.
And THAT is just plain good sense.
And
ixnay on the idingray apschay talk. That was PRIVATE, remember?