But let me humour your nonsense for a moment and ask you (again) to answer the three things that no 9/11 conspiracy nut has ever been able to answer.
(1) What is the motive for the US government to murder 3000 of it's own citizens. If you are silly enough to site the Iraq war I might point out that the case for war was built on WMD's not 9/11.
(2) How on earth did an adminstration as incompetent as this manage to pull off the biggest conspiracy in human history without any of it being leaked or discovered, when the maxim that the bigger the conspiracy the harder it is to keep it secret still holds true? The likelihood that if it had been true it would have been discovered by now, five and a bit years after the event is overwhelming.
(3) How do they explain all of those completely unrelated everyday eyewitnesses who saw nothing but planes and explosions caused by planes with not even one testimony backing up the conspiracists? Are you really going to insinuate that they are all government stooges?
I seriously doubt you are asking me these questions "again", implying that you tried once before and I ignored it (dig it up, if you can). You may use the avoidance method, but I don't.
1. Does that mean you think the US government cares about your life? Most of the biggest decision makers, including lobbying big business, care only about their own success - the only reason they would avoid using murder when it would greatly help their agenda would be if the risk of being found out was too high. Maybe you think that 9/11 was only good for starting one war - erm no. It didn't just start a war, it changed the world. This is the post-9/11 world. This is now the clash of civilisations that we are being warned will last decades. There was no reason to blame 9/11 on Iraq (would have been a much tougher sell too), because the "war on terror", started by 9/11, is going to be the cornerstone of US foreign policy for the foreseeable future.
2. Better to appear incompetent than corrupt. No, you don't get elected if you're incompetent - the campaign would never get off the ground. When you see the genius of the Bush/Rove campaigns, you must forget the idea that there are bunch of stupid people running Washington. It's too easy to say "Oh well, atleast they
tried to do the right thing." I remember that Voronwe backed me up here. There are too many brilliant minds working behind the scenes to use the argument "But Bush is too stupid". As for keeping it secret - yes that is the official stories best defense. Many big secrets have been kept in the past though. The world of black ops is one we can barely see in to. It is impossible to say it "couldn't" be done, even if the chances are small. Consider that potential whistleblowers may themselves face serious punishment for their involvement.
3. This is a classic straw man, a position you invented for me. Planes did hit the buildings and cause explosions. I do not think the eyewitnesses are in on it. And if honest eyewitnesses are intimidated, I strongly disagree with that. But I'm sure that won't disuade you from continueing to paint every skeptic with the same brush! All priests are paedophiles, right..
Any more questions?