board77

Here's another:

The Resume of George W Bush

EDUCATION:
I entered Yale in 1964 with a SAT of 1206 (Verbal 566, Math 640), 200 points below Yale's average freshman in 1970.

I graduated Yale in 1968 with a 2.35 GPA

In the fall of 1970 I was rejected from admission at University of Texas Law School.

In 1973 I applied to Harvard Business School with a 2.35 GPA. 1973 admission statistics are unavailable, but for an incomplete comparison today's Harvard students average a GPA of 3.5 - no students were accepted with a GPA lower than 2.6.

I graduated Harvard Business School with an MBA and below-average grades.

CRIMINAL RECORD:

Two negligent collisions in July and August 1962 in Houston, TX (p20)

Arrested and charged with disorderly conduct in New Haven, CT in December 1966 (p20) for stealing a Christmas tree while drunk

Convicted of drunk driving on September 4, 1976 in Kennebunkport, Maine.

MILITARY EXPERIENCE:

As a strong supporter of the Vietnam War I did everything in my power to avoid military service, both foreign and domestic:

In February 1968 I applied to the Texas Air National Guard after scoring the bare minimum of 25th Percentile (p25) for the Officer's Pilot Aptitude Test. With low scores, no other qualifications listed, and a long list of applicants ahead of me nobody is sure how I got into the guard. Ben Barnes offers one explanation, swearing under oath that he called Brig Gen. Jim Rose at the request of my father's friend Sidney Adger, allowing me a privilege I did not otherwise deserve.

I left the 111th Champagne Unit on May 24 1972, requesting a transfer to the Alabama 9921st Air Reserve, a postal unit with no airplanes and no pilots. I did not appear for any service in the 9921st.

On July 21, 1972, my transfer request to the 9921st was rejected and I was commanded to return back to the 111st in Maxwell, TX. I remained away and did not return to Texas. I refused to submit to a physical exam in August, four months after the Air Force made drug tests mandatory for pilots on April 21, 1972. I was suspended and grounded as a disciplinary measure, ensuring I would never fly again.

On September 5, 1972, I once again requested a transfer to Alabama, and once again I failed to appear (this time at the 187th). Neither my commanding officer nor Mavanee Bear, my girlfriend at the time claims to have ever seen me in uniform, though I did get a free dental checkup.

I never met the requirements for honorable discharge, earning only 38 documented points out of a required 50 in 1973-74. I also completed only 36 of 43 required inactive-duty training periods in 1972-73, and 12 of 43 required in 1973-74. Fortunately I worked something out and was issued an honorable discharge I did not earn.

My participation in the National Guard was so low that even by the end of the Vietnam Conflict I had flown only 336 hours, not meeting the minimum standards (500 hours flight experience) for combat duty. Even if I had been called to active duty I would have been unqualified to serve by military regulations.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:

I founded Arbusto Energy in 1979 with money borrowed from family friends including James R Bath, representing Salem Bin Laden. Over the next five years I accepted at least $4.7 million dollars from my father's friends including George Ohrstrom and Russell Reynolds, Jr., returning $1.5 million to investors and taking on $3 million in debt. My company was rescued by a buyout from Spectrum 7 by my successful Yale classmates Mercer Reynolds and William DeWitt Jr. in 1984.

After the failure of Arbusto I was awarded a position as Chairman and CEO of Spectrum 7. My participation resulted in more failure as the company was driven to the brink of bankruptcy. I was rescued by a buyout from my father's friends Phil Kendrick and Stuart Watson at Harken Oil and Gas in 1985.

Impressed not by my abilities but by my connections to important people I was rewarded for my failure at Spectrum 7 with a seat on the Board of Directors at Harken Oil and Gas. Harken was a miserable failure during the time I spent there - it posted $23.2 billion in losses. I was investigated by the SEC for selling my shares one week before the loss announcement, and the resulting investigation explicitly did not exonerate me.

I was the owner of the Texas Rangers, made possible only by my father's friends William DeWitt and Richard E. Rainwater. My participation resulted in incredible success for myself and terrible misfortune for my neighbors. I used eminent domain to take taxpayers' land, paid for it with $4.9 million taxpayer dollars, and then spent $191 million more taxpayer dollars to build myself a stadium. I left the city of Arlington, TX with a $7.5 million debt that I still refuse to pay, even after I sold the Rangers to Thomas Hicks for $250 million (a 2500% profit).

POLITICAL RECORD (DOMESTIC)

I ran for President in 2000. My campaign was destined to be a miserable failure until I used a whispering campaign of lies[3] in the South Carolina Presidential Primary organized by my chief political strategist, Karl Rove,[4] to destroy genuine war hero and fellow Republican John McCain, claiming he had fathered an illegitimate negro child[5] was emotionally unstable due to his torture as a POW in Vietnam and a possible brainwashed Manchurian Candidate[6].

In July 2001 I appointed Harvey Pitt to be the chairman of a kinder, gentler SEC[7] to ease regulation of foreign businesses. The results have been the largest and most miserable failures of corporate accountability in modern corporate history: Enron[8], Worldcom[9], and now Fannie Mae[10].

I am the first President to unconstitutionally restrict my opponents' First Amendment rights[11] by allowing my supporters to remain at the venue[12] while restricting my detractors to free speech zones[13], fenced-off areas up to half mile away[14] from the media, the audience, and especially myself.

I've communicated less with the American people than any other president in the history of televised news, holding only one White House press conference every 3.25 months[15], compared to my father's 1.6 per month.

To prevent activist judges from rewriting the constitution to serve an agenda that Congress would never approve, I attempted to rewrite the constitution to serve an agenda they never came close to approving. My campaign for the Federal Marriage Amendment[16] was a miserable failure: it failed to pass either house of congress. In the Senate the cloture call to end debate yielded only 48 votes, not the 67 required to pass the Senate, not the 60 votes required for cloture, not even the 50 votes of a simple majority.

My 2004 budget set the record for the largest deficit in history[17]: either $477 billion or $521 billion (CBO[18] and OMB[19] numbers, respectively).

The value of the dollar has collapsed 30% during my term[20].

Nearly every major economic indicator has deteriorated since I took office in January 2001. Real GDP growth during my term is the lowest of any presidential term in recent memory. Total non-farm employment has contracted and the unemployment rate has increased. Bankruptcies are up sharply, as is our dependence on foreign capital to finance an exploding current account deficit. All three major stock indexes are lower now than at the time of my inauguration. The percentage of Americans in poverty has increased, real median income has declined, and income inequality has grown.[21]

POLITICAL EXPERIENCE (FOREIGN)

As president I ignored Clinton's warnings about Al Qaeda, mentioning that organization only once in public statements on national security between January 20, 2001 and September 10, 2001. In the same time period I mentioned Saddam Hussein 104 times and missile defense 101 times[22].

On August 6, 2001 I received a briefing titled Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States[23] which warned that the FBI indicates patterns of suspicious activity in the United States consistent with preparations for hijacking[24]. For one month I dealt with numerous other issues[25] until the unfolding of the most successful terrorist attack in US history on September 11, 2001.

With broad international approval I temporarily disrupted the Taliban government, which has now re-emerged to control much of southern Afghanistan after I abandoned this campaign for Iraq.

I campaigned strongly for war in Iraq. I claimed that:

Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (none have been found).

Iraq had ties to Al Qaeda[26] (Iraq opposed Al Qaeda and successfully kept their operatives out of the country before September 2001[27]. The strongest claim to support a connection came from Czech intelligence services[28] and is now retracted[29]. The 9/11 commission did not believe that such a meeting occurred[30].)

Iraq would give their weapons of mass destruction to terrorists[26] (A secular Saddam would never give his ace card to religious elements he opposed throughout his life and could not control[31])

The war would be self-financing through oil sales[32] ($200 billion total has been allocated[33], and $138 billion has already been spent[34] with more to follow).

The war would end quickly, with troop deployments down to 30,000 troops by Autumn 2003[32] (March 2004 troop deployment: 114,000 US plus 23,000 Coalition troops in Iraq; 26,000 US and Coalition logistical support troops in Kuwait[35]).

Americans would be greeted as liberators (Public perception of Americans as liberators dropped from 43% at the time of invasion[36] to 2% after Abu Ghraib[37]).

By invading I would make it more difficult for terrorists to obtain Weapons of Mass Destruction (The only WMD 'discovered' in Iraq was successfully obtained by terrorists and used against Americans[38]. As a result of the invasion, nuclear equipment and materials in Iraq formerly monitored by the IAEA has disappeared and may have fallen into the hands of terrorists or rogue countries[39]. The results have been overwhelmingly negative for U.S. interests.[40])
[/UL]

I punished those who spoke unwelcome truth:

I sent Joseph Wilson[41] to Africa in February 2002 to investigate claims that Iraq had attempted to purchase uranium, where Wilson determined that those claims were based on forged documents[42]. Despite his report I continued to make public Iraq/Nigeria statements as late as January 2003[43]. When Wilson publicly contradicted me[44], one of my senior officials exposed the CIA cover of Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame[45], in an article written by Robert Novak and printed in the New York Times on July 14 2003[46]. No one is sure which senior White House official leaked the order or who was aware, but the fact that I hired James Sharp in June 2004 to represent me[47] as a personal criminal defense attorney is significant when you consider that there is no attorney-client privilege between a president and a White House counsel that allows the counsel to withhold information from a Federal grand jury.[48]

I fired Lawrence Lindsey[49] as my economics advisor in early December 2002 for claiming that the Iraq War would cost between $100 and $200 billion[50]. ($138 billion has been spent and $200 billion has been budgeted... so far)[BR]

I fired Jay Garner as US Administrator of Iraq in March 2004[51] for calling for immediate elections instead of allowing American companies to privatize government-owned assets. (American privatization and lack of a legitimate Iraqi government is one of the major reasons for unrest in Iraq.)[BR]

I made US Army Chief of Staff General Eric Shinseki[52] a lame duck in June 2003, defying precedent and announcing his successor 14 months in advance of his retirement[53] after he announced that several hundred thousand troops would be needed in postwar Iraq[54].

I threatened to have Medicare analyst Richard Foster fired[55] if he replied to Congressional requests[56] and reported that the Medicare Prescription Drug Bill[57] would cost $551 billion, $156 billion over the White House's favored estimate of $395 billion[58].[BR]

After the Iraq Health Ministry released figures showing that US and Coalition forces killed twice as many Iraqis as the Insurgents the Iraqis are supposedly being protected from[59], I acted decisively by ordering the Iraq Health Ministry to not release any more figures[60].
[/UL]

I rewarded those who spoke welcome lies, paying Ahmed Chalabi[61] and the Iraqi National Congress[62] $340,000 per month for their false intelligence gathered about Iraq[63]. Although Chalabi and the INC had been dropped from the CIA payroll in 1996 for being an unreliable source and also dismissed by the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency[64]) for the same reason, I continued to use Chalabi and the INC to support claims of WMDs in Iraq. Even after their information proved false and no weapons were found[65] I remained so close to Chalabi that he sat with Laura Bush as my Special Guest during my September 2003 State of the Union address[66]. I continued to pay the INC regularly until May 2004[67], when allegations surfaced that Chalabi had passed classified American intelligence to Iran.

I put tremendous pressure on the CIA to come up with information to support policies that have already been adopted[68] (as determined by the Senate Report of Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq[69]). When the CIA and DIA refused to verify intelligence items I wanted to believe, Donald Rumsfeld and I created the Office of Special Plans[70]. This independent department within the Pentagon was designed to bypass the CIA and feed the discredited and unreliable information I wanted to believe was true[71] back into the intelligence stream in order to support conclusions that the CIA and DIA could not. The OSP took much of the discredited information from Chalabi and the Iraqi National Congress.

I opposed the creation of the Department of Homeland Security for nine months, before turning around to take credit for its creation[72].

I opposed the creation of an independent 9/11 panel[73]. After being forced to accept the commission, I gave it only $12 million in funding to do its work (compared to $50 million combined for Whitewater and the Monica Lewinsky investigation[74]) before turning around to take credit for its creation.

My war against Al Qaeda has been a miserable failure:

The International Institute for Strategic Studies[75]' most conservative estimate (May 25, 2004) is that the occupation of Iraq has helped Al Qaeda recruit 18,000 operatives in more than 60 countries[76].

The Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University[77] has found that The war in Iraq did not damage international terror groups, but instead distracted the United States from confronting other hotbeds of Islamic militancy and actually created momentum for many terrorists. On a strategic level as well as an operational level, the war in Iraq is hurting the war on international terrorism.[78]

By my State Department's own estimates, world terror attacks are now at their highest level in 20 years, up 36% since 2001[79].

I have held 660 prisoners in Guantanamo, Cuba[80] for over two years without trial or formal charge. My prisoners, several of whom were between the ages of 13 and 16, have never been formally charged. They are kept in steel cages, subjected to ongoing torture, and denied access to legal counsel in opposition to Supreme Court rulings (Rasul v. Bush[81]). These prisoners are the worst of the worst, hard core, well trained terrorists[82] and their guilt is beyond doubt, which is why I've set 87 of them free without explanation or apology[83].

In the past year I claim to have trained 100,000 Iraqi police forces, but only 8,169 of those have passed the required 8-week training course[84]. Another 46,176 are listed as untrained.

My Secretary of Defense is the first in US history to have acknowledged ordering an intentional violation of the Geneva Conventions[85], in which Abu Ghraib prisoners were held off the books and hidden from the Red Cross. When this order was made public I refused to discipline him in any way, instead complimenting him on his job performance[86].

After being informed of abuses at Abu Ghraib on January 16[87] (first reported on January 13[88]) which included Threatening male detainees with rape[89] and Sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broom stick[89] I made freedom from torture chambers and rape rooms[90] a centerpiece in my speeches until April 29 when the story finally broke on 60 Minutes II.

My administration is the first since the Civil War to imprison US Citizens (Jose Padilla) as enemy combatants without charges, trial, or access to legal counsel. In a 5-4 decision (Rumsfeld v. Padilla[91]) the Supreme Court dodged the opportunity to rule on the legality, ruling that the case had been improperly filed.

My administration broke new legal ground by using material witness warrants to give effective life sentences to US citizens[92] without charge, trial, access to legal counsel, or even plans to prosecute[93].

My justice department was the first in US history to attempt to enforce federal regulations while refusing to disclose what those regulations are[94].

My legal war against terror has been a miserable failure: I have detained more than 5,000 people[95] on suspicion of terrorist ties, some of whom have been held without charge or without access to a lawyer. I have successfully convicted zero[96].

Thanks Lidless!

Can you believe this guy was voted as one of the top 10 Americans in history only a year or so ago?

Wow, Lidless, thank you so much for posting that!!!

Where is it from?

The first one has been circulating the net for some time. As to it's source, I have no idea.

The latter seems to have originated from here:

http://monkeydyne.com/bushresume/forward.html

...and once again has made its way around the internet without reference to the original source. Shame on them!

Please you could make an equally long list of what Bush has contibuted positvely to this country as well, but it's easier to be Michael Moore about the whole thing.


Propoganda anyone?

In the spirit of SF 'What do you intend on doing about it?', please list what you've actively done to battle against Bush. I know Iavas has written letters (if my memory serves me right, amongst other things) but what about the rest of you?

I'm not a Bush supporter by any means but the guys not gonna be in office forever so why keep painting the same picture? We know, Bush was raised with a silver spoon in his mouth, he's not very smart, and he's done a poor job (overall in some people's opinions) running the country. Why not use your energy to start campaigning for the next guy instead of dwelling on what we can't change?

and I'd remind everyone AGAIN that the point of this thread was not to bash Bush. I'm pretty much all for bashing Bush these days, but don't do it in this thread, please?

Quote:

Please you could make an equally long list of what Bush has contibuted positvely to this country

I'd love to see it.

Me too Yov, and I'm not gonna do it, but I'm sure someone could. It's always easier to focus on the negative.

Or it could be that there just isn't much positive to focus on.

I saw that answer coming from a mile away. We'll never know 'cause I'm too apathetic to attempt such a feat.

or, it could be that you can put a negative spin on almost anything...

Sure, the iraqis don't have to worry about their DICTATOR killing them indescriminantly, but now they have INSURGENTS blowing them up indescriminantly! That's MUCH worse!

That's almost like saying objective truth is impossible. There are objective ways of standing back and saying that the President's actions have been harmful without it being "spin".

yes there are, that's just not how the internet works.

Given that his approval rating is at 37% as of today, it seems more and more the Republican party at large is trying to distance themselves from him in order to increase their chances in not only this year's elections, but the big one in 2008.

Witness the Dubai ports vote.

As to finding something good about Bush, well I dare say he has done a few good things, but no more than anyone else pulled off the streets could have done.

The "leader of the free world" should be someone exceptional, that's what I want, and Bush isn't even close. He never was.

Down the road, America will look back on the Bush era with embarrassment and introspection. One can only hope some good and some understanding comes out of it, and history is not repeated.

I can't believe even 37 out of 100 people would say Bush is doing a good job..

They don't, they say they approve of him.

There are probably more that say he's doing a good job... as that's usually the way those two polls work.

halplm wrote:

They don't, they say they approve of him.

There are probably more that say he's doing a good job... as that's usually the way those two polls work.

Hal, given that I have two decades on you, and was actually YOUR age when Reagan and Bush Sr. were in office, yes, things are dire.

The federal deficit has risen 40% since 2001. Not made up, check out the stats yourself.

Bush Jr. is facing the lowest polling point approval rating of any president since the 1960s for someone in office except Nixon. At least four polls that I have seen support this. Prior to 1960, polling results were obviously biased due to time constraints in conducting them, so the comparisons are hard to justify. Even so, 37% is extremely low by any standards.

Bush's highest popular opinion poll ranking? That he "is a nice guy." Not honest, not "hard on terror," not a single thing that his spinsters try to portray of him.

Heck most of my neighbors are nice guys (and gals) but that does not mean I am voting for them in any type of political office.

I seriously state this - IMO, Bush Jr. is one of the frankly WORST presidents that we have ever elected. I am certain that history will bear me out on this. Fine, he is a silver spoon politically groomed family member whose parents wanted to establish a legacy. They got what they wanted, and this country has paid the damned price.

The only thing I can state about Bush without completely losing it is that thank goodness that he has decent health - if not, Cheney would be in charge. The corrupt corporate manipulating neocon in charge of both the military and corporate America. Yay, why yes, things could be worse.

For all of you supporting Bush's supposed domestic reforms, the rich only got richer, the average American has lost earning power since 1999, and given the current rate of national debt, it will take two decades to bring it down to a break even point. Never mind SS, Medicare, and any of the other programs which have been borrowed against so heavily, and that federal employees, including Bush, Cheney, et al are exempt from participating in such programs, it is what is there for working schmucks like me, (who have paid into it for years and years) and to chuck it all into the ashes isn't going to work.

Bush has one problem. He was raised to be a leader, and he simply is not one. He does not have the charisma, the honest forthright attitude, nor the intelligence to carry it off. He hides when he should be forthcoming, he spins to the point of deception and ignorance, and he cannot ever admit a mistake, even when it is poking him in the eye.

The Republicans have good cause to be scared. Even a good 1/3 of their own party is fed up. Take that with the Dems and the Indies, and 2008 should be a great year for the majority of us who are simply fed up. I hope this year alone scares the pants off of the GOP.

There is still one obstacle to the Bush Administration collapsing though – the Democratic Party. I think that this Onion article, while satirical, is pretty close to the mark.

Personally, I’m a little distanced from Bush so I’m not too concerned about him personally. A little more responsibility on the part of him and his administration would make me happier though – it kinda bugs me that my own country’s military can be deployed somewhere because of our ally’s divinely-inspired foreign policy.

the onion wrote:

"Universal health care, the war in Iraq, civil liberties, a living wage, gun control—we're not even close to a consensus within our own ranks," Kennedy said. "And even if we were, we wouldn't know how to implement that consensus."

Good! I know that's terrible politically and it makes calling oneself a Democrat more or less meaningless (except dislike of Bush), the idea of distilling a vast array of complex, diverse, unrelated issues into two stances - Dem or Rep - is completely absurd! What in the world does gun control have to do with health care? Why should I have to pick one party for both positions? It sucks! I never understood the "party system". An individual should tell me their individual stances on varying positions and I pick the one whose set of stances matches mine most closely. I hate essentially being forced to pick between a measly two sets of platforms as if the massive complexity of running a government could be so neatly and evenly split. Damn you two-party system!


[/osgilliation]