I don't recall the office of Mayor being created! In fact,
here there was some heated discussion about it and the following day I posted:
...May I humbly suggest that the definition and titling of the role of mayor/spokesperson/executive secretary/whatever is left untouched at the moment?
It has raised many hackles and yet it is only an idea that has been idly tossed into the ring; there has been no serious discussion of it yet.
At the moment the convetion is discussing arbitration/concilliation processes; when that is done, we can turn to defining and titling those roles.
Thing is, we haven't in any way decided that the role[s] will exist so we're jumping the gun a little and get all hot under the collar about an ethereal possibility.
and Voronwe supported this point of view.
If we are ratifying the position (and title) of Mayor now, through this very vote, I would urge that those who expressed dissatisfaction be notified?
I would hate to feel that I'd hoodwinked MariaHobbit into keeping her silence by a false impression that we'd be discussing the issue later.
In fact, I will PM her now, to notify her (for my own peace of mind).
Jn, I'm sorry about this. I don't mean to make waves, but I suspect we've been talking about 'the Mayor' for so long that many people have just assumed it's a done deal - while others are still waiting for the formal discussion.