Ah, did GC #2 come on Mother's Day? What a cunning plan that would have been!
Sorry to chime in so late, but I've had a very hard time reading the discussions on the current subjects. To be honest, although it's very possible that we are keeping the structures and procedures as simple as we intended, the language IMO is not! It's becoming almost too legal to follow, at least for me.
For example the very first choice: "violation of by-laws" vs "disruption of community".
Personally, I'd say the latter is too vague (although I think Jny explained that such a disruption would invariably be a violation of rules, too? - sorry, I read the discussion very quickly) - but I have only a very vague idea of what "by-laws" are!
I mean I looked it up when the convention started and it came up pretty early on, but it's not something I'm familiar with. So, I'm wondering about people in general - is that a very normal term to use or won't even native-speakers, if they aren't legally trained just go
at seeing a text that says "violation of by-laws"?