Actually, it's not clear that 100 votes plus 3 months received a super majority. First of all, that option alone did not. We did not offer an option that gave the addition restrictions without the 100+3 contingency, so we don't know what % of the voters wanted the additional restrictions and did not want the 100+3 but had no choice but to take both.
Prim is right. We can't re-interpret the vote afterwards so that the results suit our wishes. We have to bite the bullet and work harder on this to achieve the necessary consensus.
Jn