I wonder if you could name just one thing you think this process has lost sight of, that it had sight of at the beginning. If not, I'm afraid I have no way of understanding what you are talking about.
The people, fun, trust. There is three....
Not the most important of course, the most important is that we have a safe enviroment when we open.
It is not that the twee names are the most important issues, it is that they
appear to be the most important issues and they are smothering the important issues. They appear in the votes on the constitution and they clog up time which should be taken trying to resolve the issues in hand.
They do not need to be decided now by us here, and when like me you have little on-line time to make those decisions the last thing you want to see is another frickin vote on 'if the admin should be named ranger'. My in box has been clagged with mail on this issue, and it really is driving me away from the issues that are important here.
The reson that this whole constitution was set up was to ensure that we had a good safe enviroment set up, with controls in place before we open up to the vast multitude who are waiting to join.
What relevence to creating a safe enviroment is the name used for admin?
That is my issue here.