I would hope that even if there is no great echo at the quarterly sessions (that is, if not many people read or take part), that nevertheless a simple report to and from the Mayor, i.e. an official, formal communication between the Mayor and the members, would suffice to fulfill the demands of the law?
Quote: By the time the third or fourth "generation" of memebers is here, the Charter will look as if it had been graven in stone by the finger of JHVH, and will be ready to enshrine in the public space of your choice
(And this idea makes my first sentence in this post look suddenly odd! )
But I'm afraid I don't have your optimism, Ax, so I'd really like some feedback on my previous question, which Imp also asked about.
At the moment there are maybe five people, I'd say, who understand what all this means and entails. Even with hoping that in time some more will come to understand the processes, and that maybe one day there'll be a dozen or so people who know how this place is financed for example - this still sounds quite precarious to me.
Is there a possibility, for example, that one day none of those are around any more, and the Mayor gets a note announcing a tax investigation - and now one knows what the heck this is all about?
Or that the membership changes so that the procedures are simply forgotten? Suppose those members who are left have a good time posting, but they don't bother anymore about electing a Mayor and forget about those quarterly meetings etc - then suddenly California law writes to them and asks what's going on - are they in trouble?
Do we have to do something to make sure we don't get any subsequent generations in trouble, even if it is by their own negligence?
Edit: then suddenly California law writes to them - this reminds me: if you file an organisation like this one in real life files, don't they need someone's real life address? And if so, I suppose that would be Voronwe's law office? So, does that mean his law office is making an open-ended commitment to this board?