Did I miss the discussion part or come in late?
This part I wonder about:
Because the Mayor is primarily a record-keeper the main concern is failure to update records, schedule Ranger terms or send out notifications promptly to members. We have allowed the Mayor five instances of dereliction of duty before Rangers might convene a Hearing to remove him/her from office. Dereliction of duty means that something which must be done has not been done and the Rangers must step in on an emergency basis and do it in the Mayor’s stead. As with the Rangers, however, the Mayor will never be considered derelict if advance warning of an absence is given.
Is there a provision for gross deriliction of duty (ex: actions taken against the board itself). I would hate to think that, if by some fluke a wacko becomes Mayor, they'd get five chances to screw things up before they got questioned.