Imp, yes that might skate very close to this.
This is just me, OK, and others might respond differently, but if I saw that a member had introduced the personal information about their own self, I would not consider the responses of other posters to 'compromise privacy.'
If I undress in front of a window, the person passing in the street who sees me nekkid is not a Peeping Tom.
Maybe my interpretation of these things is too strict, or not strict enough
but I think that one can only compromise privacy with information that is intended to be private. If the info is made public by the individual in question ... then their privacy has been surrrendered rather than being compromised.
But it was asked whether a poster could change their mind and decide something they'd posted was too revealing and subsequently deleted it. Could they then ask that other posters erase revealing responses? Those of us who answered all answered "yes." So I think the point is to put the discretion in the hands of the person about whom information is revealed.
But you couldn't call a poster to a hearing if they had responded personally to personal information and then was asked to delete it later. I don't think any of our Rangers would do that, and if they did you wouldn't find a jury supporting them.
Jn