Well, Faramond and Alatar tend to be our conservative Justices
and if they agree that it would be more improper to ignore the last few votes than to count them, and everyone else seems to agree with this, we should go ahead and count them.
Has anyone sent a PM to Rowanberry? I will still need an accurate count for posting the voting numbers in Michel Delving.
And before this thread is retired to the History Forum, the results of the vote should be added to the ballot in the first post.
Um ... oh, poor Rangers ... there's some more work associated with this as well. This is the first Binding Vote we've held since we opened the board, so the Administrator i.d. has to start a new thread in the History Forum called "Directory of Binding Votes." The first post should explain that it's a directory to Binding Votes held after June 27, 2005. Then enter a link to this thread, and I've also been putting (just below the link) the date that the thread was opened (copied and pasted from the first post). Whoever does this can look at one of the other directory threads and see how it is set up.
I believe there's still some other clean-up work to do in the History Forum. I'll check that now and post what needs to be done in the Ranger thread of this forum.
Thanks, guy!
Jn