I have reason to believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner is a danger to the community because the seven most active posters in the ToE have all stated that they will withdraw from the forum and delete all of their posts if this person gains access.
But, though it clearly illustrates a danger to the ToE community, you wouldn't consider that a valid reason.
Or
I have reason to believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner is a danger to the community because on other parts of the board he/she has shown a willingness to disrespect and attack other posters. I believe that willingness would cripple an already delicate forum.
But that too, would not be considered a valid reason, because there is no sexual misconduct.
Or
I have reason to believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner is a danger to the community because he / she tends to push the boundaries when it comes to sexually related topics, and I don't believe he / she would follow any boundaries when allowed into a forum specifically for those types of topics.
But that would not be considered a valid reason because it's an subjective opinion - others might not consider said person to be a boundary pusher.
Or
I have reason to believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the petitioner is a danger to the community because has stated, elsewhere on the boards, that they consider the ToE to be "useless, in low taste, that the people posting in their should be ashamed and the forum should be gotten rid of." Based on this, I believe their request for entry is for mischief causing purposes only, and not to add to the forum. Additionally, the entry of a person with attitudes like that would cause current members of the forum to be uncomfortable in the extreme, perhaps to the point of deleting their posts.
But this would not be considered a valid reason because the person did nothing wrong, though it is obvious that they have the lowest regard for the people who do post in that forum.
I give up. I will be voting for my most recent proposal - the one you streamlined Cerin. The discussion now is on how to make your proposal even more strict, when I thought it was too far in the extreme anyway. Therefore, I have nothing more to add to this discussion.
Let me know when it's time to vote.