board77

The Last Homely Site on the Web

Should we consider banning, um, stuff?

Post Reply   Page 7 of 8  [ 146 posts ]
Jump to page « 14 5 6 7 8 »
yov is right.
Yes.
  
29% [ 2 ]
True.
  
71% [ 5 ]
Total votes: 7
Author Message
Crucifer
Post subject:
Posted: Wed 05 Dec , 2007 3:40 pm
A song outlasts a dynasty.
Offline
 
Posts: 3202
Joined: Tue 29 May , 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know...
Contact: Website
 
Let's ban complex numbers! I hates the little buggers!

_________________

Sleep is a death; Oh, make me try by sleeping what it is to die.


Top
Profile Quote
yovargas
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 1:18 am
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 14774
Joined: Thu 24 Feb , 2005 12:11 pm
 
I think we should ban bumping old threads.


Top
Profile Quote
vison
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 1:20 am
Best friends forever
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 6546
Joined: Fri 04 Feb , 2005 4:49 am
 
You nincompoop. :suspicious:

_________________

Living on Earth is expensive,
but it does include a free trip
around the sun every year.


Top
Profile Quote
Jude
Post subject: Re:
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 2:35 am
Aspiring to heresy
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 19653
Joined: Wed 23 Feb , 2005 6:54 pm
Location: Canada
 
Just looked at the first page, and had to repost this awesome photo that *E* found somewhere:
*E*V*E*N*S*T*A*R* wrote:
[ img ]

_________________

[ img ]

Melkor and Ungoliant in need of some relationship counselling.


Top
Profile Quote
yovargas
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 2:44 am
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 14774
Joined: Thu 24 Feb , 2005 12:11 pm
 
vison wrote:
You nincompoop. :suspicious:
I wuv you too. :kiss:


Top
Profile Quote
LalaithUrwen
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 2:18 pm
The Grey Amaretto as Supermega-awesome Proud Heretic Girl
Offline
 
Posts: 21757
Joined: Thu 24 Feb , 2005 3:46 pm
 
I'm not sure how I feel about the term nincompoop. Maybe we should ban it.

Love the pic, Jude! :LMAO:


(On a related note, I did decide that I was done studying last night when instead of "poor people" I wrote: They would take the nobility, artisans, and priests and leave the poop people behind.)

:help:

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
Alatar
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 2:57 pm
of Vinyamar
Offline
 
Posts: 8274
Joined: Mon 28 Feb , 2005 4:39 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact: ICQ
 
yovargas wrote:
I think we should ban bumping old threads.
I think we should ban ironic posts.

_________________

[ img ]
These are my friends, see how they glisten...


Top
Profile Quote
vison
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 3:09 pm
Best friends forever
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 6546
Joined: Fri 04 Feb , 2005 4:49 am
 
I pity the poop people. :(

_________________

Living on Earth is expensive,
but it does include a free trip
around the sun every year.


Top
Profile Quote
LalaithUrwen
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 3:35 pm
The Grey Amaretto as Supermega-awesome Proud Heretic Girl
Offline
 
Posts: 21757
Joined: Thu 24 Feb , 2005 3:46 pm
 
Yes, the poop people. Jesus said we'd always have the poop people with us, but we should always be kind and generous toward them.

In this case, they probably got the better end of the deal. They got to stay in their own land. It was the rich ones who got carried off to Assyria or Babylon and put into service. The lucky poop people kept their homes.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
yovargas
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 3:39 pm
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 14774
Joined: Thu 24 Feb , 2005 12:11 pm
 
Alatar wrote:
yovargas wrote:
I think we should ban bumping old threads.
I think we should ban ironic posts.
:bawl: :bawl: :bawl:


Top
Profile Quote
vison
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 4:01 pm
Best friends forever
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 6546
Joined: Fri 04 Feb , 2005 4:49 am
 
Lalaith, you write so movingly. Now I am sobbing for the poop people. :bawl:

_________________

Living on Earth is expensive,
but it does include a free trip
around the sun every year.


Top
Profile Quote
LalaithUrwen
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 7:42 pm
The Grey Amaretto as Supermega-awesome Proud Heretic Girl
Offline
 
Posts: 21757
Joined: Thu 24 Feb , 2005 3:46 pm
 
:( I'm sorry. It's just that, well, their plight is so terrible. We should all weep for the poop people. And we should give to the poop people, too. They need our contributions.

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
Jude
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 9:28 pm
Aspiring to heresy
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 19653
Joined: Wed 23 Feb , 2005 6:54 pm
Location: Canada
 
LalaithUrwen wrote:
:( I'm sorry. It's just that, well, their plight is so terrible. We should all weep for the poop people. And we should give to the poop people, too. They need our contributions.
Guess what happens when I run that through the Translation Party?
Quote:
I'm sorry. It is, well, just that its plight is terrible. We all need people who shed tears of dung. And we also need to give people shit. They should be our contribution.
Quote:
I'm sorry. It is just such a terrible plight, well,. We are all people who need shit tears. And we also need to give people shit. They should help us.
Quote:
I'm sorry. It is, well, just such a terrible situation. We need to tear the shit out of all people. And we also need to give people shit. They help us please.
Quote:
I'm sorry. It is, well, just such a terrible situation. We need to destroy all the people shit. And we also need to give people shit. They help us please.
*howls with laughter*

_________________

[ img ]

Melkor and Ungoliant in need of some relationship counselling.


Top
Profile Quote
vison
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 9:59 pm
Best friends forever
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 6546
Joined: Fri 04 Feb , 2005 4:49 am
 
Ha. You would. :x

Will no one think of the poop people? :x

_________________

Living on Earth is expensive,
but it does include a free trip
around the sun every year.


Top
Profile Quote
Jude
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Fri 26 Nov , 2010 10:55 pm
Aspiring to heresy
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 19653
Joined: Wed 23 Feb , 2005 6:54 pm
Location: Canada
 
Quote:
Will no one think of the poop people?
Quote:
What do you think people in feces Will anyone?
Quote:
Will do you think people who shit about?
Quote:
Shit you people would not believe what do you think?
Quote:
Shit people, what do you think you believe?
Quote:
Shit what people do you think you believe that?
Quote:
People are shit, you think you believe it?
Quote:
People are shit, do you think you believe it?
Quote:
People, do you think your shit do you believe it?
Quote:
People are shit, you think you believe it?
Quote:
People, do you think your shit do you believe it?
Quote:
It is doubtful that this phrase will ever reach equilibrium.

_________________

[ img ]

Melkor and Ungoliant in need of some relationship counselling.


Top
Profile Quote
yovargas
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Sat 27 Nov , 2010 12:11 am
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 14774
Joined: Thu 24 Feb , 2005 12:11 pm
 
:LMAO: :LMAO: :LMAO: :LMAO: :LMAO: :LMAO: :LMAO: :LMAO:


Top
Profile Quote
*E*V*E*N*S*T*A*R*
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Sat 27 Nov , 2010 2:52 am
I've cried a thousand oceans, and I would cry a thousand more if that's what it takes to sail you home.
Offline
 
Posts: 11477
Joined: Fri 29 Oct , 2004 2:22 am
 
[ img ]



I was just looking at that pic yesterday, Jude. :P

So don't remember the context of this thread. Figured it was about Hal when the e-mail update came in.




*E*

_________________

[ img ] For always.


Top
Profile Quote
LalaithUrwen
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Sat 27 Nov , 2010 3:49 am
The Grey Amaretto as Supermega-awesome Proud Heretic Girl
Offline
 
Posts: 21757
Joined: Thu 24 Feb , 2005 3:46 pm
 
Quote:
People are shit, you think you believe it?
:bow:

This is my new life motto.

:Wooper: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

_________________

[ img ]


Top
Profile Quote
yovargas
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Sat 27 Nov , 2010 6:50 am
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 14774
Joined: Thu 24 Feb , 2005 12:11 pm
 
So? Do you think you believe it? :poke:


Top
Profile Quote
Jude
Post subject: Re: Should we consider banning, um, stuff?
Posted: Sat 27 Nov , 2010 10:18 am
Aspiring to heresy
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 19653
Joined: Wed 23 Feb , 2005 6:54 pm
Location: Canada
 
Actually, my new motto is "We need to give people shit." In fact, that's going to be the theme of tomorrow's sermon. :cool:

_________________

[ img ]

Melkor and Ungoliant in need of some relationship counselling.


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 7 of 8  [ 146 posts ]
Return to “The Turf” | Jump to page « 14 5 6 7 8 »
Jump to: