Jynusa wrote:
Regarding the character of Melkor ... Melkor is himself a creation of Iluvatar ... and so the consequences of Melkor's creation must have been anticipated. .
Yes. Exactly!
How relieved I am that someone (finally) seems to agree with me.
Here's what I wrote in that other Sil thread:
" My brain will insist on picking it apart and trying to understand the nature of Iluvatar and the Valar. The fact that the infinite is unknowable by the finite doesn't satisify. So, we have the concrete (me) analyzing the metaphysical (divinity). An excercise bound to end in frustration. I keep comming back to Melkor and the other Valar as manifestations of Iluvatar's thought: that even although, once born and free to manifest his will in their own inividual ways;
the thought that produced Melkor must have contained a discord within itself. The problem that I have with this is that it speaks to pre-ordination which in turn violates the concept of free will."
And therein lies the paradox.
Is the Marring of Arda determined from the very inception of Iluvatar's thought? And is Melkor the way in which it is meant to be realised?
I apologise in advance to Ath, Voronwe and Alatar for the revisiting of my favourite puzzle (free will/determinism)
I am still not convinced that Melkor actually had free will; that he chose to pursue evil and the dark.
I take note of the fact that in my newly purchased Sil, Tolkien himself states that
his (Melkor's) was a sub-creative fall. Nevertheless, as I read the myth, Iluvatar meant Melkor to be the source of chaos.
... I shall have a similar problem with Feanor and the making of the Silmarils as well, btw.
Just sayin'