Hal, you would support a hearing against the rangers because you have a beef with the rangers. That doesn't make you in the least bit objective.
Keep in mind, I wouldn't be able to be involved in that hearing either, as I, obviously, wouldn't be objective towards CG. You aren't the only one who wouldn't have a voice. I "made up rules" that took my voice away as well.
You and I would both have to suck it up and deal with it. The difference is, I would, whereas you would call yourself a victim.
In the end, there won't be a hearing because there simply isn't a precedent in the charter for it. If CG really wants to get something changed, he should drop the idea of a current hearing against the rangers, and instead try to get an amendment made to the charter where a normal member could, indeed, call for a hearing with support from other members of the board, just as a ranger could call for a hearing with support from the other rangers. Granted, that amendment couldn't be grandfathered, but it would give him the abilities in the future to do what he is ineffectually fighting to do now.