I disagree that sf should have to allow access to his private messages. Yes, the burden of proof is on sf, but solictr has not chosen to deny that he sent that message.
If he does so deny, then yes, we would need to establish proof. But since he has not done so, I can only assume that either:
1. He did send that message, and sees nothing wrong with it. Grounds for a permanent ban.
2. He's not overly concerned with being banned from here. Not in itself grounds for a ban, but since he doesn't care, why should anyone else?
By the way - rangers, you are checking the administrator email, right? Just in case he's unable to post in the Bike Racks, for whatever reason.
_________________
Melkor and Ungoliant in need of some relationship counselling.