BALLOT
1. All admin decisions may be contested.
I accept this provision
A. Yes
2. Disputes of a personal nature involving an admin can be resolved at the Bike Racks or by regular Arbitration
I accept this provision
A. Yes
3. In more serious cases, like bannings, or a poster feeling treated unjustly when having their posting rights restricted, etc. there is a more formal case from the outset and the procedures are described in the article on Member Rights.
I accept this provision
A. Yes
4. Members may contest in the following way any admin decisions made while excercising the routine powers of admins, such as edits, moving threads, etc.
a. The member affected by the action contacts the admin by PM or email and requests that the action be reviewed
b. If the poster and the admin can reach an agreement between them, nothing else need be done. If the poster and the admin cannot agree, the poster can ask for an independent review.
c. The independent review will decide to overturn or uphold the decision.
(You vote on who should do the review in the next question.)
I accept all three steps of this provision:
A. Yes
5. The Independent Review will be done by:
Please rank your choices:
A: Two other admins and one jury member
B: Two other admins and the mayor
C: One admin, one mayor, one jury member of the poster's choice
D: One admin, one jury member of the poster's choice, and the mayor gets to break a tie
#1 =C
#2 =D
#3 =A
#4 =B