Question 1: We will create an office whose function is to oversee hearings and ensure that proper procedure is followed. This person will be a resource for juries and all other participants in a Hearing. It will be their responsibility to be familiar with all aspects of the charter concerning the Outside Forum, Member Rights and Responsibilities, Powers of the Admins and any other issues affecting Hearings.
B. I do not agree to the creation of this Office
Question 2: This office would be an elected office, similar in nature and duration to the office of Mayor but with a different area of responsibility.
B. I do not agree with this statement
Question 3: The title of this office will be:
#1= D
#2= E
#3= B
#4= C
#5= F
#6= A
#7= G
An explanation is necessary from me, I think, as I have been vocal about the different skill sets needed for the two roles being considered as I see them.
I realised that how I envision them is quite sketchy and may have little to do with the reality of those roles - and I feel at a loss to decide on one of them without having fully discussed the other. I think the two roles (if they are going to be two roles, rather than one) need to be looked at together. And I have been swayed recently by opinions stated by others.
However, if the Loremaster role is decided on, I can live with that.
In fact, I'm coming round to the point of view that we should have 3 persons elected as Loremasters to work as a team in all those tasks envisioned to date - because having just one person means they can't get sick, go on holiday or have a RL event without deleterious impact on the MB