Primly, that's not being a pain in the rear, that's easy to do.
That having said, I'm not sure I agree with you.
To me, Question 1 should come first, because it describes what happens first (the "head's up announcement") along with the general process (there was so little debate about this general process that it does make sense to break it up into three separate sections). The committee would not be created until 20 days after that, so it does not make sense to me to me. As to moving Question 5 before 3 and 4, I would not have a problem with that, though to me it is six of one and half a dozen of the other.
So 1, 2, 5, 3, 4, 6, 7 would work for me, but I would prefer not to move Question 1 to the back of the list. Of course, if most people seem to agree with Prim, then I will gladly change it.