Alatar, I think it is clear that people want all people making objections to have to explain those objections. Is this what you are proposing? In that case, what is the point of the poll?
Unfortunately Cerin I believe you are projecting your own opinions onto these statements. I would instead say:
It is clear that
some people want
all people making objections to have to explain those objections.
It is clear that
some people want
some people making objections to have to explain those objections.
It is clear that
some people want
no people making objections to have to explain those objections.
If you are proposing that some people object by email and some vote in a poll, that is Estel's compromise proposal and doesn't satisfy the desire that everyone objecting state why.
However it does satisfy the basic desire for some accountability without complete transparency that others desire
It seems as I feared, that the 'poll' poll has clouded the issues that might have been clarified by the other polls.
Again, I feel that the poll options were not the ones I would have chosen. It might have been better to discuss what we would ask in the polls on committee because any poll written by an individual will always be skewed towards the matters that interest them.
Let me make this clear Cerin. I am not suggesting for one second that you are deliberately skewing the ballots the way you want them to go, however I do believe that your own beliefs are making a strong impression. No offense intended.
Alatar