and if the rangers' actions were appropriate in this regard
We are not here to judge the Rangers. If you are found innocent of the violations, that will be the time to ask whether they should have acted, whether or not they overreacted, and if so, what penalties they should face. That would be a whole other hearing with a whole new set of jurors. The current jurors job is to listen to evidence and witnesses regarding the current hearing, which is "
Hearing on Disruption of the Symposium Forum against halplm"
I was, indeed, asking for witnesses.
I was not asking for people to come in and make general comments or a referendum against you Hal.
Because you and the rangers dispute what occurred, the only way to verify if what the rangers did was necessary or not, which is to say, whether or not you may have violated rules of the charter, is to bring in witnesses.
If the rest of the Jurors agree, the witnesses will be questioned as such:
Each witness who comes forward will be asked a set of questions, in which it will be endevoured to have the answers simply be yes, no or maybe.
Personal accounts of how people felt will not, in most cases, be asked for, and if offered, will be deleted.
Please feel free to ask people to come forward who will speak for you. They will not be attacked, nor questioned in a manner any different to any other witness.