1. In relation to Article 9 - Persistent posting of objectionable content.
First, How many board members PMed or emailed you to object about your posts, how many multiple complaints there were, and how many board posted complaints there were?
(Aside: While answering these questions, I was referring to the arguments between SF and myself, which is really what the second section of questions was asking, but I was confused. In reference to "objectionable content." I have received no PM, email, or board comment accusing me of posting objectionable content. The first I heard of such an accusation was when it was listed here as something I had violated.)
I had one PM conversation with jewelsong where we each sent two PMs. This was less an objection and more of a discussion. I received no other PMs or emails from when I started posting again, until Holbytla suspended my posting rights.
For board posted complaints, I am using the most liberal definition I can think of. If somone commented on the what was happening in the thread, rather than on the topic of the thread, I'll call that a "complaint." Most of the time, this was not aimed at me, but at the "thread," "discussion," or at myself and SF both. I have not included complaints against SF specificially.
I found 18 comments or complaints in the symposium (and those split off into the bikeracks) over 4 days leading up to the suspension of posting rights.
There were also a couple of discussions in the contact a ranger thread in the business room forum totally about 80 posts, many of which were mine. I'm not sure how you would characterize this, as there was a lot of complaining about me, but it was in a discussion on the topic of what was going on. All of these posts are in the bikeracks if you would like to read through them.
Second, How many warnings, both in PM, email and out in the threads, did you receive before your Symposium permissions were revoked?
None by PM, none by email. There were no official warnings on the board. There were many threats by HOlbytla that he was going to "do something" if we didn't do as he said. This is what led to me asking him to step down as a ranger which led to the discussions mentioned above. He was more interested in imposing his will on the board, than in issuing official warnings and such, and doing things by the book.
Third, once your permissions for the Symposium were revoked how many warnings, both in PM, email and out in the threads, did you recieve before you were limited to the Bikeracks?
None in any place. Holby's initial post about the suspension of posting rights said "further action would be taken" if SF and I took our arguments outside of the symposium, but this did not happen. My restriction to the bikeracks was in response to calling the rangers on their abuse of power, which resulted in them confining me to the bikeracks with no warning, and without explanation.
Forth, as this is a member moderated board, how many and what warnings/complaints/comments did you receive through PM, Email or on the board itself other than from the poster you were in dispute with and other than Rangers?
Half of the 18 comments were from non-rangers. In the discussion in the business room, it was probably about the same. Most of all of these were from the same 3 or 4 that has wanted action taken against me for some time.
2. In relation to Article 2, Members Rights and Responsibilities
Violation of the right for members to post free of disruptions caused by the personal disputes of others.
First, How many board members PMed or emailed you to object about the ongoing dispute between you and SF, how many multiple complaints there were, and how many board posted complaints there were?
At first I was a bit confused as this seems the same question as above. Everything I talked about in the answers to the first section seems to apply here, as that is what people were complaining about/discussing. I would refer you to that section for this answer.
3. In Relation to Article 2, Members Rights and Responsibilites
Violation to refrain from using PM capability to harass other members of the board
First, How many members recieving the PMs emailed, PMed or posted complaints to you about receiving the PM?
4 PMs, no email, and I found 2 posts complaining about it, but I don't know where all to look, so I might have missed some.
Second, Was a warning given to you, either on the board, by email or through PM before the PM privileges were revoked?
No.
Third, what is the exact number of members who you PMed
50, including myself, so 49 I guess.
4. In Relation to Article 5,]¶1: The Bike Racks Forum
First, a violation may have occured when threads were started in response to threads outside the Bikeracks Forum. How many of these threads did you start?
Were any of these threads started because of splitting action taken by the Rangers? If so, please link to those you did start, and those that were started by splitting, separating them into two categories listed as such.
I'm curious to know what violation may have occured, but I will list the threads in the bikeracks that I started after I was confined there. Everything else was split or moved there. The only one that was not started there, but was moved there, was this one:
http://www.board77.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=5983" target="_blank" target="_blank
The following were started there:
http://www.board77.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=5991" target="_blank" target="_blank
http://www.board77.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=5989" target="_blank" target="_blank
http://www.board77.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=5988" target="_blank" target="_blank
http://www.board77.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=5993" target="_blank" target="_blank
http://www.board77.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=6002" target="_blank" target="_blank
http://www.board77.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=5985" target="_blank" target="_blank
http://www.board77.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=5990" target="_blank" target="_blank
http://www.board77.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=5987" target="_blank" target="_blank
Second, A violation of use may have occured when multiple threads dealing with the same issue were started.
How many of these threads did you start?
Were any of these threads started because of splitting action taken by the Rangers? If so, please link to those you did start, and those that were started by splitting, separating them into two categories listed as such.
No such threads exist other than threads dealing with ranger "Abuse of Power." At no point has more than one of these threads been unlocked. Most were name changes of previous threads as I was not allowed to start new ones after the old one was locked... which is of course an abuse of power in itself.
Third, a violation of use may have occured when multiple threads were started that did not involve resolution of disputes.
How many of these threads did you start?
Were any of these threads started because of splitting action taken by the Rangers? If so, please link to those you did start, and those that were started by splitting, separating them into two categories listed as such.
I have not started any threads to resolve disputes, so all of them I guess fall into your categorization.
Forth, Did you recieve a warning, either on the board, by email or through PM before posting privileges were revoked?
I'm not sure which posting privileges you are referring to. If it was the inability for me to start new threads, Holby threatened to remove my ability to post at all, and Rebecca said they'd try to find a way to prevent me from starting new threads. There was no warning (or new threads started) between Rebecca's warning, and River's removing my privileges.
That's the best I can do, and I feel obligated to point out again, that I'm not sure all of this is relevant, and there are other things that are highly relevant IMHO.