I did not say I was offended - look at my post, I just said I would greatly appreciate it, because baby is an emotional term - but maybe that's also my feeling because I am not a native speaker of English.
It's hard to offend my feelings, and once more I did not once say I was offended, it is just that a fetus (sorry to have it spelled the German way) is not a baby. That's just a point, a fact. I could also object the word killing, from my point of view, but I already see how that is a question of point of view. But still then it is a fetus. Of course in conversation I also said: I'm going to have a baby - emphasis on "going to". It was a still a baby to become, not yet one.
Anyway, I am with Tosh and I think it can also be stated that countries which have the less restrictive laws on abortion are by far not those where most of the abortions take place. There is no correlation between the severity of the laws and the number of abortions.
Also, Freddy, of course you are right:
The person who is at fault for this murder is the man who is in custody.
Yes, the man who held the gun is guilty and will hopefully be punished for his crime. But if he killed, especially in such a symbolic place, then, because he felt he had the moral right if not even obligation to kill this doctor - and this motive, he has not found it on his own.